The paper focuses on Truth & Reconciliation Commission-Canada’s-94 Calls to Action.This short essay wants you to practice creating an argument for and against a certain topic. You will be comparing three texts to create this argument.
Truth & Reconciliation Commission-Canada’s-94 Calls to Action
This short essay wants you to practice creating an argument for and against a certain topic. You will be comparing three texts to create this argument. The three texts are: 1. The Government of Canada’s “Delivering on Truth & Reconciliation Commission Calls to Action” website 2. CBC News’ “Beyond 94: Truth and Reconciliation in Canada” website 3. Yellowhead Institute’s “Calls to Action Accountability: A Status Update on Reconciliation” article.
Directions The context for your essay is the Truth & Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s 94 Calls to Action, so choose one of the four below Calls to get started: A. Call to Action 2 (Child Welfare) B. Call to Action 23 (Health) C. Call to Action 35 (Justice) D. Call to Action 50 (Reconciliation) Your completed essay will have three complete paragraphs: In your first paragraph, provide a short introduction and summary to your chosen Call to Action. Define any terms that you may be unfamiliar with. Consider what action is required to consider this Call to Action “complete”.
In your second paragraph, read all three of the above texts and compare their content. All three of these texts are following the progress on the TRC’s Calls to Action, so they should be the same, but they are not. What are their differences? In your third paragraph, consider your above comparison to make your final argument, which will answer the question: which text is the clearest to you? In this final paragraph, you will need to say why you think your choice is correct and why the other two texts are less clear than the one you chose.
Do you need Assignment help from intel-writers.us?