Discussion 6 | Scholarly Journals



Read Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation (opens in new window) then address the following questions https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237011/



After relying on scholarly material in this course and going through the initial steps of research, does this article surprise you? Why or why not?

Respond to your peers by sharing some ways we can continue to share high-quality research despite these challenges?


Initial posts: Minimum 200 words

2 APA formatted sources




Factorial and single-subject methodologies are usually sub-types of the approaches we’ve reviewed before. These can be common versions of some of these approaches, especially in psychology, where we may not ethically be able to control interventions. They can be challenging in their own ways, but consider how they might further enhance our knowledge.


Read the following chapters of your textbook, Research Methods in Psychology, to prepare for this week’s discussion and assignment. 

IX. Factorial Designs (opens in new window) https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/part/factorial-designs/


X. Single-Subject Research (opens in new window) https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/psychmethods4e/part/single-subject-research/


Watch the following video to prepare for the upcoming assignment.

PSYC 300 Part 5 | Research Proposal – Disseminating Findings for Business [00:03:36] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlxbQFwU2_s