Remedies in Contract, Tort and Restitution- compensatory aims analysis

The assignment focuses on Remedies in Contract, Tort and Restitution. Also, there is a description of compensatory aims analysis. So, you are required to analyse how compensatory aims differ in the award of compensatory damages in contract and tort.

Remedies in Contract, Tort and Restitution- compensatory aims analysis

Question: Critically analyse how compensatory aims differ in the award of compensatory damages in contract and tort. Can any differences be justified? PLEASE USE THE GRADING SCHEME PLEASE USE THE SOURCES ON THE WORD DOCUMENT WORD COUNT INCLUDES FOOTNOTES ONLY, NOT BIBLIOGRAPHY – PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE BIBLIOGRAPHY IN THE WORD COUNT PLEASE ALSO TAKE PARTS FROM THE OTHER 3 PDFS PLEASE INCLUDE INFORMATION FROM THE LECTURE SLIDES AND LINK THEM TO SOURCES AND THE QUESTION PLEASE WRITE THIS ESSAY TO A HIGH STANDARD Please write to the standard of 80% to 90% USING THE GRADE SCHEME ATTACHED.

Remedies in Contract, Tort and Restitution- compensatory aims analysis

Any first-year torts student knows that the defendant’s argument will not succeed. The defendant’s conduct does not control the amount of the plaintiff’s compensatory damages. The damages are based on the plaintiff’s injury because, in tort law, the purpose of compensatory
damages is to make the plaintiff whole by putting him in the same position as if the tort had not occurred.1 But there are tort claims where the amount of compensatory damages is not always based on the plaintiff’s injury. Suppose that a defendant fraudulently misrepresents that a car for sale is brand-new.

Detailed Instructions

Download |

Do you need Assignment help from intel-writers.us?

Click here to request for this assignment help