The following assignment is about Public Figures Ethics: Michael Jackson and Donald Trump. summarize clearly and accurately comment or critique incisively are alert to the complexity of ethical concepts and issues are sensitive to the nuances, ambiguities, and beauties of language show an understanding of ethical principles and approaches.
Public Figures Ethics: Michael Jackson and Donald Trump
Whenever you read or hear an interesting or questionable argument about an ethical issue, remember or copy it, then write a summary [if it is online, give a URL link] and comment for the Dustbin. Whenever one of your classmates posts an argument or comment that seems interesting or questionable, write a response for the Dustbin* Public Figures Ethics: Michael Jackson and Donald Trump
The best grades will go to posts which: summarize clearly and accurately comment or critique incisively are alert to the complexity of ethical concepts and issues are sensitive to the nuances, ambiguities, and beauties of language show an understanding of ethical principles and approaches, and an ability to apply them maintain civility even in disagreement. Public Figures Ethics: Michael Jackson and Donald Trump
My argument is about how certain celebrities/public figures are so big. That they’re past actions are not enough to destroy them. Thus, there are examples like Harvey Weinstein, R kelly and Kevin spacy who were destroy because of their allegations. But figures such as Michael Jackson and Donald Trump who continued to be successful and were not brought down. Please use the examples of Michael Jackson and Donald Trump, (Sexual allegations, past lawsuits, bad actions, etc.). Please use good grammar and use the examples I have. Also, uploaded on the files, examples of what an argument should look like. Ensure the case you provide will relate with the given topic.
Read more on Public Figures Ethics: Michael Jackson and Donald Trump here