. Clearly you’re discussing the topic of academic dishonesty, but at times it seems like you’re looking at it from the perspective of why it’s wrong to engage in, and at times from the perspective of what a teacher should do if they suspect their student of doing it. Those are related issues, and they’re both interesting, but you want to be sure you frame your discussion so that you move between sub-topics in a way that looks deliberate. You don’t want your reader to suspect that you may have lost track of what you were originally trying to talk about. Does that make sense? Other than that, it looks solid. Feel free to let me know if you have additional questions.
