Long term environmental hazards- Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol
The paper focuses on Long term environmental hazards. It also focuses on US’s handling of the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol. So, in particular, the paper gives a comparison of the long term environmental hazards associated with nuclear power and those associated with fossil fuels
Long term environmental hazards- Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol
Responses should be in your own words, well-stated, yet appropriately concise. Also,Demonstrate your comprehension of the content and apply it to the questions below. A final space at the end got provided for you to raise any outstanding questions. You may have that I can provide further guidance on for the class. The greater point value questions expected to get completed. With more length and detail while brief responses are acceptable for the lower point value questions.
1. Compare the long term environmental hazards associated with nuclear power and those associated with fossil fuels. 1 point
From your readings, identify three health concerns associated with fracking and the mechanism. By which, fracking believed to contribute to ill health. 1 point
Describe the parallels in the US’s handling of the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol. From your perspective, what do these parallels reflect US environmental policy? 1 point
Long term environmental hazards -nuclear power
From a review of peer-reviewed literature and other valid sources, identify the green energy. Alternative (ex: wind, solar, hydro, etc) you believe to hold the most promise for meeting Pennsylvania’s energy needs. Also,explain why this energy source is most feasible. Also, Provide sufficient detail to ensure your rationale is well-understood and include a minimum of two citations. 4 points
Just any potential health and environmental impact of fracking is not yet fully understood. Therefore, many other energy-related projects are underway/under consideration. Do some basic research on one of the following and identify the at least two key points. Held, by those in favor and those against one of the following issues (you pick): Keystone XL Pipeline or Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling. Include at least two citations. 4 points
