Australia and New Zealand’s potential responses to the PSIDS regarding sea-level rise

Paper details:

[there is no need to write PSIDS’s position, just write directly Australia and NZ’s position, no introduction, general information or background descriiption needed. I just need the deep analysis]

1. Freezing the maritime boundaries

a. Australia’s position

[considering factors re free navigation, regional fishery organizations, relationship with Pacific region, united states, China]

[observing from Australia’s position in the PIF, SPC, ILC’s first issues paper, UNFCCC]

 

b. New Zealand’s position

[considering factors re free navigation, regional fishery organizations, relationship with Pacific region, united states, China]

[observing from NZ’s position in the PIF, SPC, ILC’s first issues paper, UNFCCC]

 

c. Australia and New Zealand’s position re PSIDS’s effort seeking judicial intervention from ICJ and ITLOS (2012 and 2022)